this multiple-choice question in exam today, , (at least) 1 of answers should true, me wrong.
the sorting steps are:
5 2 6 1 3 4
4 2 6 1 3 5
4 2 5 1 3 6
4 2 3 1 5 6
1 2 3 4 5 6
the available answers were: bubble sort, insertion sort, selection sort, merge sort , quick sort.
none of them.
- bubble sort: no. after k steps, last k elements should k largest, sorted.
- insertion sort: no. after k steps, k first elements should sorted.
- selection sort: no. after k steps, k first elements should s smallest, sorted.
- merge sort: no. after k steps, value can have moved
2^k - 1
places. (5 moves 5 places @ k=1) - quick sort: no. whatever pivot is, 1 , 6 being extreme values, can stay in initial position.
on quick sort: make clear not possible, lets enumerate results of each pivot first step:
- 5 :
[2134] - 5 - [6]
. (2134 may in order) - 2 :
[1] - 2 - [5634]
- 6 :
[52134] - 6
- 1 :
1 - [52634]
- 3 :
[21] - 3 - [564]
- 4 :
[213] - 4 - [56]
one obvious way of seeing incompatible op's output in each case, 1
before 6
, no matter how implement pivot or partition.
Comments
Post a Comment